The fatal accident that changed everything
Florida, 2019: A Tesla Model S crashes into two people on the side of the road with Autopilot switched on. 22-year-old Naibel Benavides Leon dies, her boyfriend survives seriously injured. Now - five years later - a US court has ruled that Tesla is partly to blame.
The jury in Miami ordered the electric car manufacturer to pay a total of 243 million dollars, consisting of 129 million dollars in compensatory damages and 200 million dollars in punitive damages - of which Tesla must pay 33 percent. The rest of the responsibility lies with the driver. However, the driver has not been charged - and does not have to pay anything.
This is the first time that Tesla has been held accountable for a fatal accident involving Autopilot - and it certainly won't be the last.
Autopilot - progress or negligent freedom?
At the center of the verdict is Tesla's controversial driver assistance system, the so-called autopilot. According to the jury, this system gave the driver the impression that he could relinquish control, even though the technology was not designed for this. The driver allegedly bent down for his cell phone - the Tesla drove on unperturbed, across an intersection, at 100 km/h into a parked SUV - and killed a person in the process.
Tesla defends itself with a well-known argument: the operating instructions explicitly state that the driver always remains responsible. But this is precisely what does not convince the jury. After all, if a system suggests that it "drives itself", it must also give a timely and reliable warning when danger is imminent.
Data deleted - by mistake?
One explosive aspect: Tesla initially deleted the vehicle data. Only when the plaintiffs reconstructed it from the on-board computer did Tesla release the original data - and later spoke of an "oversight". In a fatal accident, of all things.
The jury did not make it easy for itself - and obviously took a close look. Because what is at stake here is far more than a single accident: it is about the future of mobility - and the question of how much responsibility a car manufacturer must bear for systems that drive (almost) autonomously.
No more excuses
Anyone who sells an autopilot should not be surprised if drivers eventually believe that the car drives itself. Anyone who then says in an emergency: "It was the human's fault" is making things too easy - and dangerously convenient.
The fact that Tesla claims to have "accidentally" deleted data in this case sounds to us - to put it mildly - like a PR disaster with a legal aftertaste. Such systems need more than just technology - they need transparency, responsibility and consistency. An autopilot must not be a free ride. Nor should it be an acquittal for the manufacturer. This ruling was long overdue - and will cost Tesla dearly.
Understand the legal consequences of autopilot technologies and protect your company. Book a consultation with our lawyers now!
to the lawyerAt a fixed price of 169 EURO (gross)
