Image: Studio Romantic/Shutterstock.com
ECJ Ruling on Online Casinos: A Delicate Phase Begins for Many Providers
The European Court of Justice has issued a ruling that could suddenly become highly significant for many gamblers in Germany. The case concerns money lost in online casino games—and the question of whether those losses can be recovered. As Legal Tribune Online reports, the ruling from Luxembourg clearly sides with consumers.
The case centered on a player from Germany who had lost money between 2019 and 2021 at two online operators based in Malta. At that time, the regulations in Germany were significantly stricter than they are today: online casino games were generally prohibited. Nevertheless, many people used services based abroad. This very situation gave rise to a dispute that has persisted for years and has since led to thousands of legal proceedings.
A foreign license does not automatically provide protection
The companies in question argued that their Maltese license should, in principle, be sufficient within the EU. They invoked the European freedom to provide services. Put simply: anyone who operates legally in one EU member state should not have their services arbitrarily blocked in other member states. Furthermore, the providers argued that players could not complain later if they had knowingly used the platforms.
The European Court of Justice has now clearly ruled on this matter. The judges made it clear that member states are permitted to restrict the gambling market in order to protect consumers. The fight against illegal or unregulated markets can also justify such restrictions. This means that European law does not require Germany to simply accept every foreign license.
Players don't automatically act in an abusive manner either
A second point in the ruling is particularly important. In the court’s view, mere participation in the game is not sufficient to characterize a claim for reimbursement as an abuse of rights. This eliminates an argument that providers have long relied on. Thus, those who have gambled do not automatically lose the right to claim reimbursement of lost wagers at a later date.
This is particularly significant for Germany. Many cases were put on hold because the courts wanted to wait for the ruling from Luxembourg. That hiatus is now likely to come to an end. This could lead to a surge of new or resumed trials.
The consequences could be costly
The ruling is a delicate matter for the industry. While it involves many individual claims, the cumulative impact poses significant risks. According to Legal Tribune Online, lawyers are already talking about potential liabilities in the millions for operators. At the same time, the ruling does not apply across the board to every form of online gambling. The focus is primarily on online casino games. Further questions remain regarding sports betting.
Am Ende zeigt die Entscheidung vor allem eins: Der digitale Glücksspielmarkt war lange bequemer, schneller und größer als die rechtliche Klarheit. Genau das rächt sich jetzt. Wer Geschäfte in einem Land macht, ohne dort wirklich abgesichert zu sein, darf sich später nicht hinter dem europäischen Binnenmarkt verstecken. Die eigentliche Provokation liegt aber woanders: Jahrelang wurde der Eindruck erzeugt, als sei dieses Modell normal und unproblematisch. Nun zeigt sich, dass viele Spieler womöglich auf Plattformen unterwegs waren, die rechtlich auf viel dünnerem Eis standen, als es die Werbung vermuten ließ.
Sources: lto.de
Are you an online casino operator and unsure about the new legal requirements? Get advice now and avoid legal pitfalls!
to the lawyerAt a fixed price of 169 EURO (gross)
