Online law firm since 2003

Available 24/7

Satisfaction guarantee

Trusted by over 60,000 clients

Recht 24/7
Back to overview
Work Life

"Submachine gun against Merkel?" – Why this police officer lost her job for good

Feb 2, 20263 min read

Almost 30 years of service—and then the abrupt end

Maria P. wore a uniform for almost three decades. She was a senior inspector, 58 years old, assigned to the mounted police unit, and, according to her own statement, one of the first women ever to join the police force. But her professional life came to an abrupt and permanent end. As reported by the Münchner Merkur newspaper, the Munich Administrative Court ruled that this woman could not remain a police officer.

The reason is not a minor misstep, a careless remark, or a slip of the tongue. The judges came to the clear conclusion that Maria P. had adopted the ideology of the so-called Reich Citizens and even spread it while on duty. And that, they said, was incompatible with the police profession.

Reich Citizens' content in everyday police work

What was presented to the court is difficult to digest. Maria P. sent materials from the Reich Citizens' Movement from her private email account to her work address. She apparently read this content during working hours, saved it, and forwarded it. She is said to have printed and copied anti-constitutional documents at her workplace. Photos showed boxes full of flyers.

In addition, there were chat messages and videos with extreme content. One video claimed that Adolf Hitler "only wanted peace." Other chats involved conspiracy theories surrounding the coronavirus vaccine—allegedly a deliberate means of killing people and reducing the population.

Particularly alarming: Maria P. is reported to have said to a colleague, "Give me a submachine gun—and I'll go and shoot her." She was referring to the then German Chancellor Angela Merkel.

"I just wanted to find out more" – a flimsy excuse

The former police officer tried to explain herself in court. She said she had only wanted to find out more. She said she supported the constitution, had made mistakes, but had learned from them. She said the difficult coronavirus period had thrown her off track and that the pandemic had "made her ill."

However, the court and the Free State of Bavaria were unimpressed. It was not only the material itself that was decisive, but the overall picture: no clear departure, no clear distancing, no clear commitment to the constitution – even years later.

In addition, Maria P. repeatedly refused to provide information during the trial. She also refused to say anything about other colleagues who may have shared similar views. The only thing that became known was that there is at least one other disciplinary proceeding.

No second chance—and no sympathy from the court

"I love my job and ask for a second chance," Maria P. said at the end. But the verdict was clear: removal from civil service. No ifs, ands, or buts.

For the court, it was clear: anyone who is supposed to protect the state as a police officer must not simultaneously reject or question it internally. Trust is not an option here, but a duty.

And now let's be clear

This is not a "victim of COVID-19," not a tragic mistake, not a misunderstanding. Anyone who spreads Reich Citizens' ideology, expresses violent fantasies, and shares extremist content as a police officer simply has no place in this profession. Period.

What is alarming is not only the case itself, but its duration: how long such attitudes apparently remain unnoticed—and how late action is taken. Those who wield power, weapons, and authority must be particularly clear-headed. The rule of law depends on its guardians standing firm on its ground. If that is no longer the case, a harsh judgment is not a scandal—it is necessary.

Source: merkur.de

Learn about the legal details and how you can protect yourself. Book a consultation with our experts now!

to the lawyer

At a fixed price of 169 EURO (gross)

Do you have a specific legal question?

Our lawyers advise you online at a fixed price: fast, clear and without an office appointment.

Get started

Your case starts here.

Personal advice
Directly from a lawyer

Transparent fixed prices
with no surprises.

Response within
24 hours

Securely insured
up to €2.5 million

No legal jargon, just clear answers.

The Recht 24/7 newsletter: deadlines, rulings and tips for founders and clients. Once a month.

I have read the privacy policy. You can unsubscribe at any time.

Trusted Shops
Trusted Shops

4.89/5

| 677 reviews

Verified client · Contract check · April 2026 · Translated from German

Very fast, very thorough, very professional!: The fast and professional evaluation and assessment of my contract helped me make an informed decision. All around very fast, very thorough, very professional!

Verified client · Contract review, apartment purchase · February 2026 · Translated from German

Expectations were exceeded!: At first I was skeptical whether the online service would measure up to a personal conversation with a lawyer. But Recht 24/7 exceeded my expectations. Highly qualified staff, fast response times.

Verified client · Legal advice · June 2026 · Translated from German

Great experience, the processing happens in a truly unbeatable time. For me, with two orders, already in under 24 h, and that at a price that is completely unbeaten compared to the market.

Verified client · GmbH liquidation · January 2026 · Translated from German

Support with the liquidation of a GmbH: The responses always came very promptly, and my questions were answered clearly and understandably. My expectations were not only met but exceeded. Recommended without reservation.